|  |  | 
 The movie will be released in Spring 2003
 (January 17, 2002) PIRATED COPIES OF BPM 
      IN ASIA | NEW IMAGES RELEASED
 Yahoo! News reports 
      that pirated copies of Bulletproof Monk have already surfaced on the Malaysian 
      & Honk Kong black market. It is considered one of the worst security 
      breaches of a film's copyright yet seen in Asia, as the film is not expected 
      to open for another 4 months. It is believed that the pirated video was 
      shot illegally during test screenings in the U.S. last year. No worry though, 
      as the test screening was only a rough version of the movie. Many of the 
      movie's special effects & reshoots have yet to be completed.
 (thanks to Charlotte Guymon & MonkeyPeaches.com for the info)
 
 
 
 (October 22, 2002) ***FIRST TEST SCREENING REVIEWS 
        OF BULLETPROOF MONK***Ain't-It-Cool-News 
        has posted reviews from the first test-screening of Bulletproof Monk which 
        were held this past Saturday night. The participants who attended the 
        screening were told they would be watching a movie called Silver Bullet, 
        which in fact turned out to be the first official test-screening of Bulletproof 
        Monk! Note that a "test screening" is not the final cut from 
        the movie. It is merely a rough cut of the movie to see how the audience 
        reacts to it. The music, special effects, and editing are not completed 
        in this version. The reviews posted on the movie site provide extensive 
        scene-by-scene descriptions of the movie, including major plot spoilers 
        and character descriptions. Among the three reviews, the first one (which 
        was the most extensive review) was pretty negative, citing problems with 
        the movie's storyline, special effects, and action sequences. However, 
        the reviewer admits that this WAS a rough cut of the film (ie: incomplete 
        special effects & editing), and says that the movie has potential. 
        He also makes some suggestions on how it could be better. The second and 
        third reviews were more positive. Rather than repeating points from the 
        reviews here, click on the following link to read the reviews for yourself.
 (thanks to Roderick T. for the info)
 
 
 
 |  |